Performance of CURB-65, PSI, and APACHE-II for predicting COVID-19 pneumonia severity and mortality

5Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

No prognostic tools for the prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia severity and mortality are available. We explored whether CURB-65, PSI, and APACHE-II could predict COVID-19 pneumonia severity and mortality. We included 167 patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia in this retrospective study. The severity and 30-day mortality of COVID-19 pneumonia were predicted using PSI, CURB-65, and APACHE-II scales. Kappa test was performed to compare the consistency of the three scales. There was a significant difference in the distribution of the scores of the three scales (P < 0.001). Patients with PSI class ⩽III, CURB-65 ⩽1, and APACHE-II-I all survived. The ROC analysis showed the areas under the curve of the PSI, CURB-65, and APACHE-II scales were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74–0.93), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69–0.90), and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75–0.92), respectively. Our findings suggest that PSI and CURB-65 might be useful to predict the severity and mortality of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, J., Liu, B., Du, H., Lin, H., Chen, C., Rao, S., … Xie, Y. (2021). Performance of CURB-65, PSI, and APACHE-II for predicting COVID-19 pneumonia severity and mortality. European Journal of Inflammation, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/20587392211027083

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free