Adoption of Total Quality Management in the Educational Sector: Case Study of Engineering Institutions

1Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Due to the aspirations of various institutional stakeholders clamoring for improvement in the quality of education in their various institutions, the concept of total quality management has gained so much attention to this regard. In the recent time, several emphases have been made on the need for quality improvement and efforts are been put in place on the possible ways of increasing the standard of education globally. The productivity of any tertiary institution, especially the Engineering colleges is centered on the quality culture of such institutions, also, the customer's satisfaction is another thing to put into consideration, to achieve the desired productivity. Generally, there are some constructs which are the major critical success factors that enhances quality improvement in any organization, customer satisfaction has been identified as another important factor to put into consideration to achieve optimum quality of products as well as services. This paper gives an insight on how the implementation of Total Quality Management in an Engineering educational system can aid the Quality of Engineering Education.

References Powered by Scopus

Managing the co-creation of value

2479Citations
4283Readers
Get full text

Six Sigma: Concepts, tools, and applications

236Citations
467Readers
Get full text
142Citations
203Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oluwafemi, I. J., & Laseinde, O. T. (2019). Adoption of Total Quality Management in the Educational Sector: Case Study of Engineering Institutions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1378). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/3/032002

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

64%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

9%

Arts and Humanities 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0