Adenosine deaminase activity in pig saliva: analytical validation of two spectrophotometric assays

27Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We validated 2 assays for the measurement of adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity in the saliva of pigs: the Giusti–Galanti manual method (ADA-GG) and a commercial automated assay (Diazyme Laboratories; ADA-D). Intra-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were <7 and 9%, and interassay CVs were <12 and 5%, for ADA-GG and ADA-D, respectively. Accuracy was measured by 2 methods: recovery and linearity-under-dilution. Recovery was 82.4–106.8% for ADA-GG, and 92.8–107.9% for ADA-D. Serial dilutions showed R2 > 0.95 and 0.99 for ADA-GG and ADA-D, respectively. Linear regression between the methods gave R2 = 0.997 (p < 0.0001), and a Bland–Altman plot showed a proportional bias of 112 IU/L (95% confidence interval of −99 to 322 IU/L) for ADA-D. No significant differences were observed between the results obtained by either method in saliva or serum. ADA activity was much higher in porcine saliva than in serum. Salivary ADA activity was significantly higher in lame pigs compared to healthy animals. However, serum ADA activity was significantly lower in lame pigs.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tecles, F., Rubio, C. P., Contreras-Aguilar, M. D., López-Arjona, M., Martínez-Miró, S., Martínez-Subiela, S., & Cerón, J. J. (2018). Adenosine deaminase activity in pig saliva: analytical validation of two spectrophotometric assays. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 30(1), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638717742947

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free