Natural logic and semantics

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two of the main motivations for logic and (model-theoretic) semantics overlap in the sense that both subjects are concerned with representing features of natural language meaning and inference. At the same time, the two subjects have other motivations and so are largely separate enterprises. This paper returns to the topic of language and logic, presenting to semanticists natural logic, the study of logics for reasoning with sentences close to their surface form. My goal is to show that the subject already has some results that natural language semanticists might find interesting. At the same time it leads to problems and perspectives that I hope will interest the community. One leading idea is that the target logics for translations should have a decidable validity problem, ruling out first-order logic. I also will present a fairly new result based on the transitivity of comparative adjective phrases that suggests that in addition to 'meaning postulates' in semantics, we will also need to posit 'proof principles'. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moss, L. S. (2010). Natural logic and semantics. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6042 LNAI, pp. 84–93). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free