Is virtual reality the future of learning? A critical reflection

5Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The year 2016 marks the so-called second wave of VR, which was initiated by the first consumer VR-HMD, Oculus Rift (development kit), entering the market. There are four practical advantages in the field of virtual reality learning: a shift from abstract to tangible settings, interactivity rather than passive observations, using desirable but practically infeasible methods, and breaking the bounds of reality. In contrast, current VR technologies also feature certain limitations. The most common negative factor is motion sickness, which distracts the user. We conducted a multiple case study and invited 41 people to participate in two different scenarios. One was a self-developed 360° video and the other was a self-developed interactive scenario. We investigate different barriers which hamper individual learning in VR and we point out that there is a potential for implicit learning in virtual reality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwarze, A., Kampling, H., Heger, O., & Niehaves, B. (2019). Is virtual reality the future of learning? A critical reflection. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2019-January, pp. 1759–1768). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free