Estimating a tail exponent by modelling departure from a Pareto distribution

173Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We suggest two semiparametric methods for accommodating departures from a Pareto model when estimating a tail exponent by fitting the model to extreme-value data. The methods are based on approximate likelihood and on least squares, respectively. The latter is somewhat simpler to use and more robust against departures from classical extreme-value approximations, but produces estimators with approximately 64% greater variance when conventional extreme-value approximations are appropriate. Relative to the conventional assumption that the sampling population has exactly a Pareto distribution beyond a threshold, our methods reduce bias by an order of magnitude without inflating the order of variance. They are motivated by data on extrema of community sizes and are illustrated by an application in that context.

References Powered by Scopus

Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments

1047Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized pareto distribution

1014Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Maximum likelihood estimation in a class of nonregular cases

597Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Statistics of extremes: Theory and applications

453Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Graph mining: Laws, generators, and algorithms

325Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chapter 53 The evolution of city size distributions

317Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feuerverger, A., & Hall, P. (1999). Estimating a tail exponent by modelling departure from a Pareto distribution. Annals of Statistics, 27(2), 760–781. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1018031215

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

19%

Researcher 3

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

36%

Computer Science 3

27%

Engineering 2

18%

Mathematics 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free