Cryptanalysis of the RSA subgroup assumption from TCC 2005

19Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

At TCC 2005, Groth underlined the usefulness of working in small RSA subgroups of hidden order. In assessing the security of the relevant hard problems, however, the best attack considered for a subgroup of size 2 2ℓ had a complexity of (2ℓ. Accordingly, ℓ=100 bits was suggested as a concrete parameter. This paper exhibits an attack with a complexity of roughly 2ℓ/2 operations, suggesting that Groth's original choice of parameters was overly aggressive. It also discusses the practicality of this new attack and various implementation issues. © 2011 International Association for Cryptologic Research.

References Powered by Scopus

The Chirp z‐Transform Algorithm and Its Application

280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Linear Filtering Approach to the Computation of Discrete Fourier Transform

279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factorization of a 768-Bit RSA modulus

228Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Faster algorithms for approximate common divisors: Breaking fully-homomorphic-encryption challenges over the integers

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improved secure integer comparison via homomorphic encryption

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Security analysis of multilinear maps over the integers

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coron, J. S., Joux, A., Mandal, A., Naccache, D., & Tibouchi, M. (2011). Cryptanalysis of the RSA subgroup assumption from TCC 2005. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6571 LNCS, pp. 147–155). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19379-8_9

Readers over time

‘11‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

11%

Researcher 3

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 20

77%

Physics and Astronomy 2

8%

Engineering 2

8%

Mathematics 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0