Most writing on environmental ethics concerns the dichotomy between humans and non-humans, and much of the work in the field has been motivated by the effort to escape #x201C;anthropocentrism#x201D; with respect to environmental values. Resulting debates about whether to extend #x201C;moral considerability#x201D; to various elements of non-human nature have been, to say the least, inconclusive. In this paper, a new approach to re-conceptualizing our responsibilities toward nature is proposed, an approach that begins with a re-examination of spatio-temporal scaling in the conceptualization of environmental problems and human responses to them.
CITATION STYLE
Norton, B. G. (2013). Facts, Values, and Analogies: A Darwinian Approach to Environmental Choice. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 296, pp. 63–82). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5067-8_5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.