The validation of chinese version of the victimization subscale of the revised peer experiences questionnaire

1Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In China, researchers have translated and validated several scales to measure victimization behavior. The aim of the present study was to validate the Chinese version of the victimization subscale of the Revised Peer Experiences Questionnaire (RPEQ) among primary school students. Primary school students aged between 8 and 13 years old (n = 1048) were asked to complete the Chinese version of the victimization subscale of the RPEQ and related scales. We examined internal consistency and the factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Depression, peer relationship, and sleep scales were used to measure construct validity. The CFA results suggested that the four-factor model had a good model fit. The results indicated that internal reliability was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.83). Construct validity was mostly supported by scores on the Chinese version of the victimization subscale of the RPEQ that strongly and positively correlated with depression and negatively correlated with peer relationship and sleep quality. The present study indicated that the Chinese version of the victimization subscale of the RPEQ has adequate reliability and validity for measuring bullying problems among Chinese primary school students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fan, L., Liu, B., Jin, Z., & Zhu, X. (2021). The validation of chinese version of the victimization subscale of the revised peer experiences questionnaire. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062937

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free