Benchmark dose estimation for cadmium-induced renal tubular damage among environmental cadmium-exposed women aged 35-54 years in two counties of China

15Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: A number of factors, including gender, age, smoking habits, and occupational exposure, affect the levels of urinary cadmium. Few studies have considered these influences when calculating the benchmark dose (BMD) of cadmium. In the present study, we aimed to calculate BMDs and their 95% lower confidence bounds (BMDLs) for cadmium-induced renal tubular effects in an agespecific population in south-central China. Methods: In this study, urinary cadmium, β2-microglobulin, and N-acetyl- β-Dglucosaminidase levels were measured in morning urine samples from 490 randomly selected non-smoking women aged 35-54 years. Participants were selected using stratified cluster sampling in two counties (counties A and B) in China. Multiple regression and logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the dose-response relationship between urinary cadmium levels and tubular effects. BMDs/BMDLs corresponding to an additional risk (benchmark response) of 5% and 10% were calculated with assumed cut-off values of the 84th and 90th percentile of urinary β2-microglobulin and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase levels of the controls. Results: Urinary levels of β2-microglobulin and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase increased significantly with increasing levels of urinary cadmium. Age was not associated with urinary cadmium levels, possibly because of the narrow age range included in this study. Based on urinary β2-microglobulin and N-acetyl-b-DOPEN glucosaminidase, BMDs and BMDLs of urinary cadmium ranged from 2.08 to 3.80 (1.41-2.18) mg/g cr for subjects in county A and from 0.99 to 3.34 (0.74-1.91) mg/g cr for those in county B. The predetermined benchmark response of 0.05 and the 90th percentiles of urinary β2-microglobulin and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase levels of the subjects not exposed to cadmium (i.e., the control group) served as cut-off values. Conclusions: The obtained BMDs of urinary cadmium were similar to the reference point of 1 mg/g cr, as suggested by the European Food Safety Authority, indicating that cadmium exposure must be reduced to protect human health.

Figures

  • Table 1. Cut-off values of U-b2M and U-NAG for subjects in county A (CA) and county B (CB).
  • Table 2. Means (SD/GSD) of age, U-Cd, U-b2M, and U-NAG of 269 participants in county A (CA) and 225 participants in county B (CB) g.
  • Table 3. Results of the multiple linear regression analysis on individual factors related to Cd-induced renal tubular damage.
  • Table 4. Results of the logistic regression analysis on individual factors related to Cd-induced renal tubular damage.
  • Table 5. Prevalence of hyper-U-b2M and hyper-U-NAG corresponding to U-Cd intervals among subjects in county A (CA) and county B (CB) at different cadmium exposure levels1.
  • Table 6. Prevalence of hyper-U-b2M and hyper-U-NAG corresponding to U-Cd intervals among subjects from county A (CA) and county B (CB) at different cadmium exposure levels1.
  • Table 7. Benchmark dose (BMD) estimates of U-Cd levels based on U-b2M and U-NAG using a quantal-linear model 1.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, J., Li, M., Han, T. X., Chen, J. W., Ye, L. X., Wang, Q., … Burdmann, E. A. (2014). Benchmark dose estimation for cadmium-induced renal tubular damage among environmental cadmium-exposed women aged 35-54 years in two counties of China. PLoS ONE, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115794

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Researcher 4

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

40%

Environmental Science 2

20%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

20%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0