Learning is not education

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Researchers and policymakers speak more often now about ‘learning’ than they do about ‘teaching.ߣ In this chapter, I explore what is beneficial, and what is concerning, about the shift of focus from the teacher’s perspective to the learner’s perspective. However, a theory of learning is not sufficient to support a wider conception of education, because learning must be enacted to be worthwhile and because the factors that go into shaping when learning is enacted go beyond matters that can be said to have been learned themselves. A wider conception of education needs to consider these other factors. This examination has implications for questions of teaching and how to evaluate it, for thinking about learning outcomes and whether and how they can be ‘measured,ߣ and for the normative elements and judgments that must go into any wider conception of ‘education.'

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burbules, N. C. (2013). Learning is not education. In Educational Research: The Attraction of Psychology (pp. 159–166). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free