Moth light traps perform better with vanes: A comparison of different designs

4Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Many light trap designs exist in the field of applied and basic entomology for catching moths, yet a robust comparative analysis of structural designs of such traps is lacking. Our study compares the performance of three different trap designs to assess the effect of presence/absence of vanes and their colour on trapping efficiency. LepiLED lamps were used in all traps as the light source. We hypothesized that traps with vanes (white and black) would perform better than the same trap with rods, since it improves flight interception of insects. Furthermore, we expected that between the two designs with vanes white would be more efficient than black due to a higher radiation emission and better visibility. The study was conducted between July and September 2021 at two locations in the nature reserve Jenaer Forst (Jena, Germany, N 50.926694, E 11.556583). At each location, we sampled in three understorey sites parallelly. The abundance, diversity and body size of 4432 moths belonging to 170 species and 12 different families were analysed. Traps with white vanes performed best with 10.5% more individuals and 7% more species than the trap with black vanes and with 19% more individuals and 16% more species than the traps with rods. Differences were significant between the two vane traps against rods, for both individuals and species, but differences between the two vane traps were not. In addition, traps with white vanes and with rods were tested indoors under controlled conditions for selected species. In four out of ten species, significantly more individuals were collected in the vane traps. We conclude that the use of vanes as a flight interception tool is important for improving the trapping efficiency. The colour of vanes is also likely to play a role because of an overall higher radiation emission and better visibility for insects.

References Powered by Scopus

Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference

2706Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Variable selection – A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician

1002Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test

494Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

DIPTERA SPECIES, NEW FOR THE REPUBLIC OF MORDOVIA, RUSSIA

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semiochemical-baited traps as a new method supplementing light traps for faunistic and ecological studies of Macroheterocera (Lepidoptera)

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The moth fauna is more diverse in the understorey than in the canopy in a European forest

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, R. P., Böttger, D., & Brehm, G. (2022). Moth light traps perform better with vanes: A comparison of different designs. Journal of Applied Entomology, 146(10), 1343–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.13068

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

100%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free