Bad Inquiry: How Accountability, Power, and Deficit Thinking Hinder Pre-Service Practitioner Inquiry

  • Schroeder S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study of 30 pre-service teachers’ practitioner inquiry papers explores potential pitfalls of practicing inquiry with pre-service teachers. Focusing on the types of questions pre-service teachers ask about student learning, the challenges they face when engaging in inquiry, and the weaknesses of their inquiry products, this paper finds that accountability culture in education, pre-service teachers’ lack of power in the classroom, and deficit thinking left unchallenged by instructors led to weak inquiries. Implications include the need for teacher educators to work with mentor teachers across university and K-12 boundaries, and the need to teach explicitly about the power inquiry holds in neoliberal contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schroeder, S. (2020). Bad Inquiry: How Accountability, Power, and Deficit Thinking Hinder Pre-Service Practitioner Inquiry. Journal of Practitioner Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5038/2379-9951.5.1.1122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free