Space and symbols: Transforming parliamentary buildings in South Africa and Germany

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter examines two cases - Germany and South Africa - in which existing parliamentary buildings have been part of the efforts to build new inclusive democracies and to come to terms with the past as part of a profound political transformation. Both polities underwent this transformation in the 1990s after extended periods of political turmoil, division and conflict. In both, the parliament and its building - the Reichstag in Germany and the Cape Town Parliament buildings in South Africa - had an important symbolic association with that prior history of conflict and non-democratic rule. But the decision was made, as part of that political transformation, not to build a new legislature for the new democracy but to retain the existing one. And in each case the decision to use the pre-existing building was also accompanied by attempts to refashion the content and symbolic meaning of that building, as part of the creation of a new inclusive representative democracy that would turn its back on a troubled past. This chapter will compare the effectiveness of these efforts in Germany and South Africa in helping to build a new democracy and come to terms with the past.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waylen, G. (2014). Space and symbols: Transforming parliamentary buildings in South Africa and Germany. In Democracy in Practice: Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament (pp. 211–233). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361912_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free