Is Catheter Ablation Better Than Antiarrhythmic Drugs for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Long-standing atrial fibrillation is associated with significant morbidity including stroke and development of heart failure. Patients also report poor quality of life as a result of debilitating symptoms or treatment side effects from antiarrhythmic medications. Radio frequency or cryothermal mediated catheter ablation has a central role in the management of symptomatic patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation is vital to the success of this therapy and other ancillary techniques have been described, especially for persistent atrial fibrillation. Several randomized controlled studies have been reported over the last two decades studying important clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. In this article, we aim to provide a review of the major studies that have helped define the role of catheter ablation in the management of symptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients with both diseased and structurally normal hearts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Natarajan, B., Nayak, S., & Pai, R. G. (2020). Is Catheter Ablation Better Than Antiarrhythmic Drugs for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation? International Journal of Angiology, 29(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700985

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free