Exploration and assessment of the oviposition substrate by the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Oviposition behaviour of Delia radicum is not only influenced by host plant quality but also by the quality of the substrate in which the plant grows. Direct behavioural observations showed that the females partition their visits to a host plant (cauliflower) into ovipositional bouts separated by exploration of the host plant surface. Ovipositional bouts were further partitioned into acts of egg deposition separated by exploration of the substrate. While the mean number of ovipositional bouts per visit (2.6), and eggs laid per egg deposition event (1.4) were stable, the mean number of egg deposition events per ovipositional bout significantly varied (from 2.1 to 7.3) with the quality of the substrate and the physiological state of the female (egg load). Ovipositing females adjusted the final number of eggs laid around the plant during the behavioural stage of substrate exploration. Additional experiments using plant surrogates treated with methanolic extract of Brassica leaves mounted in different substrates showed that: (a) the presence of living Brassica, Hordeum or Allium roots in a substrate enhances the number of eggs laid into this substrate, but females do not discriminate between the different plants; (b) females avoid both wet and dry substrates and prefer the substrates with a dry surface and moist particles directly accessible at a depth of about 5 mm; (c) substrates rich in organic matter are preferred to sand; (d) olfactory perception of volatile chemicals from the substrate must at least partially be responsible for the differences in oviposition in various substrates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Košťál, V., Baur, R., & Städler, E. (2000). Exploration and assessment of the oviposition substrate by the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). European Journal of Entomology, 97(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2000.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free