Incomprehensibility: The role of the concept in DSM-IV definition of schizophrenic delusions

11Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper the role of incomprehensibility in the conceptualization of the DSM-IV definition of delusion is discussed. According to the analysis, the conceptual dependence of DSM-IV definition of delusion on "incomprehensibility" is manifested in several ways and infested with ambiguity. Definition of "bizarre" delusions is contradictory and gives room for two incompatible readings. Also the definition of delusion manifests internal inconsistencies and its tendency to account for delusions in terms of misinterpretation is bound to miss the content of the traditional comprehension of delusionality. It is suggested that the ambiguities in defining delusions has to do with the question whether psychiatric practice is better accounted for in terms of the grammar of "incorrectness" or of "incomprehensibility".

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heinimaa, M. (2002). Incomprehensibility: The role of the concept in DSM-IV definition of schizophrenic delusions. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 5(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021164602485

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free