Reflective learning: Problems and questions concerning a current contextualization of the vygotskian approach

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Both the works of art and the theoretical concepts are forms of knowledge based upon the hypothetical nature of our knowledge about reality. For reflective learning, the importance of works of art and theoretical concepts lies in the fact that they are spaces for development of thinking; they are never objects, results or drilled routines, methods and techniques. They are spaces for development of thinking in a special way: the subject will be able to think himself or herself. Drawing on an empirical research project, we shall inquire into following question: In what way is the sphere of the hypothetical or, the thinkable or the possible a space in which the human being can unfold his existence as a free and active being, potentially infinitely capable of development? © 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fichtner, B. (2005). Reflective learning: Problems and questions concerning a current contextualization of the vygotskian approach. In Activity and Sign: Grounding Mathematics Education (pp. 179–190). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free