Between-occupation differences in work-related COVID-19 mitigation strategies over time: Analysis of the Virus Watch Cohort in England and Wales

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives COVID-19 mitigations have had a profound impact on workplaces, however, multisectoral comparisons of how work-related mitigations were applied are limited. This study aimed to investigate (i) occupational differences in the usage of key work-related mitigations over time and (ii) workers’ perceptions of these mitigations. Methods Employed/self-employed Virus Watch study participants (N=6279) responded to a mitigation-related online survey covering the periods of December 2020–February 2022. Logistic regression was used to investigate occupation- and time-related differences in the usage of work-related mitigation methods. Participants’ perceptions of mitigation methods were investigated descriptively using proportions. Results Usage of work-related mitigation methods differed between occupations and over time, likely reflecting variation in job roles, workplace environments, legislation and guidance. Healthcare workers had the highest predicted probabilities for several mitigations, including reporting frequent hand hygiene [predicted probability across all survey periods 0.61 (95% CI 0.56–0.66)] and always wearing face coverings [predicted probability range 0.71 (95% CI 0.66–0.75) – 0.80 (95% CI 0.76–0.84) across survey periods]. There were significant crossoccupational trends towards reduced mitigations during periods of less stringent national restrictions. The majority of participants across occupations (55–88%) agreed that most mitigations were reasonable and worthwhile even after the relaxation of national restrictions; agreement was lower for physical distancing (39–44%). Conclusions While usage of work-related mitigations appeared to vary alongside stringency of national restrictions, agreement that most mitigations were reasonable and worthwhile remained substantial. Further investigation into the factors underlying between-occupational differences could assist pandemic planning and prevention of workplace COVID-19 transmission.

References Powered by Scopus

A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior

966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Principles of confounder selection

910Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transmissibility and transmission of respiratory viruses

550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: a review

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection at a UK electricity-generating company: a test-negative design case-control study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring organizational aspects that promote health-related preventive behavior: using the example of work-related SARS-CoV-2 infection control measures in Germany, August 2020 to November 2021

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beale, S., Yavlinsky, A., Hoskins, S., Nguyen, V., Byrne, T., Fong, W. L. E., … Hayward, A. (2023). Between-occupation differences in work-related COVID-19 mitigation strategies over time: Analysis of the Virus Watch Cohort in England and Wales. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 49(5), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4092

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

33%

Chemical Engineering 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0