Pulsatile intracranial pressure (ICP) is a key to the understanding of several neurological disorders in which compliance is altered, e.g., hydrocephalus. A recently proposed model suggests that ICP pulse is a standing wave and not a transmitted wave. The present work, aimed at obtaining a better understanding of the pulsatility in the cranium, tries to test the following hypotheses: first, ICP pulse onset latency would be lower than that of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) pulses measured at a distal vessel; second, CBFV pulse at different intracranial arteries will have different pulse onset latencies, and hence they are not generated as a standing wave. The dataset used in the present study consists of ICP and CBFV signals collected from 60 patients with different diagnoses. The results reveal that the ICP pulse leads CBFV for 90% of the patients regardless of the diagnosis and mean ICP value. In addition, we show that CBFV pulse onset latency is roughly determined by the distance of the measurement point to the heart. We conclude that the ICP signal is not generated as a standing wave and that ICP pulse onset may be related to the arteries proximal to the heart. © 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien.
CITATION STYLE
Asgari, S., Vespa, P. M., Bergsneider, M., & Hu, X. (2012). Latency relationships between cerebral blood flow velocity and intracranial pressure. In Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum (Vol. 114, pp. 5–9). Springer-Verlag Wien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.