A practical guide to sliding and surface semilandmarks in morphometric analyses

89Citations
Citations of this article
261Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Advances in imaging technologies, such as computed tomography (CT) and surface scanning, have facilitated the rapid generation of large datasets of high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) specimen reconstructions in recent years. The wealth of phenotypic information available from these datasets has the potential to inform our understanding of morphological variation and evolution. However, the ever-increasing ease of compiling 3D datasets has created an urgent need for sophisticated methods of capturing high-density shape data that reflect the biological complexity in form. Landmarks often do not take full advantage of the rich shape information available from high-resolution 3D specimen reconstructions, as they are typically restricted to sutures or processes that can be reliably identified across specimens and exclude most of the surface morphology. The development of sliding and surface semilandmark techniques has greatly enhanced the quantification of shape, but their application to diverse datasets can be challenging, especially when dealing with the variable absence of some regions within a structure. Using comprehensive 3D datasets of crania that span the entire clades of birds, squamates and caecilians, we demonstrate methods for capturing morphology across incredibly diverse shapes. We detail many of the difficulties associated with applying semilandmarks to comparable regions across highly disparate structures, and provide solutions to some of these challenges, while considering the consequences of decisions one makes in applying these approaches. Finally, we analyze the benefits of highdensity sliding semilandmark approaches over landmarkonly studies for capturing shape across diverse organisms and discuss the promise of these approaches for the study of organismal form.

References Powered by Scopus

Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists

1866Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’

1708Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A revolution morphometrics

1693Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

High-Density Morphometric Analysis of Shape and Integration: The Good, the Bad, and the Not-Really-a-Problem

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thirty years of geometric morphometrics: Achievements, challenges, and the ongoing quest for biological meaningfulness

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ALPACA: A fast and accurate computer vision approach for automated landmarking of three-dimensional biological structures

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bardua, C., Felice, R. N., Watanabe, A., Fabre, A. C., & Goswami, A. (2019). A practical guide to sliding and surface semilandmarks in morphometric analyses. Integrative Organismal Biology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obz016

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 105

66%

Researcher 40

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102

66%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 27

18%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 13

8%

Medicine and Dentistry 12

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0