Deinstitutionalizing Independence: Discourses of Disability and Housing in Accessible Computing

6Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The meaning of "homes"is complicated for disabled people because of the historical link between (de)institutionalization, housing, and civil rights. But, it is unclear whether and how this history impacts Accessible Computing (AC) research in domestic spaces. We performed Critical Discourse Analysis on 101 AC articles to explore how (de)institutionalization affects domestic AC research. We found (de)institutionalization motivates goals of "independence"for disabled people. Yet, discourses of housing reflected institutional logics which are in tension with "independence"-complicating how goals were set, housing was understood, and design was approached. We outline three discourses of housing in AC and identify parallels to those used to justify institutionalization in the USA. We reflect upon their consequences for AC research. We offer principles derived from the Independent Living Movement as frameworks for challenging institutional conceptions of housing, to open new avenues for more holistic and anti-ableist domestic AC research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Storer, K. M., & Branham, S. M. (2021). Deinstitutionalizing Independence: Discourses of Disability and Housing in Accessible Computing. In ASSETS 2021 - 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471213

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free