I analyze bibliometric data about fundamental physics worldwide from 1970 to now, extracting quantitative data about gender issues. I do not find significant gender differences in hiring rates, hiring timing, career gaps and slowdowns, abandonment rates, citation, and self-citation patterns. Furthermore, various bibliometric indicators (number of fractionally counted papers, citations, etc.) exhibit a productivity gap at hiring moments, at career level, and without integrating over careers. The gap persists after accounting for confounding factors and manifests as an increasing fraction of male authors going from average to top authors in terms of bibliometric indices, with a quantitative shape that can be fitted by higher male variability.
CITATION STYLE
Strumia, A. (2021). Gender issues in fundamental physics: A bibliometric analysis. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00114
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.