Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence

345Citations
Citations of this article
181Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper examines or current state of knowledge of the epidemiology of urinary incontinence. The population studied was community-dwelling non-institutionalized persons. The review includes discussion of the prevalence, incidence, natural history and presence of racial and ethnic differences in the epidemiology of urinary incontinence. We also review correlates and potential risk factors that have been revealed in epidemiological studies. Differences between epidemiological and clinical approaches to a health problem, help-seeking behavior and methodological issues for research are also discussed. We have reviewed a large number of completed studies in the field of urinary incontinence, and have emphasized high-quality and population-based studies. We also wished to present studies from a variety of countries. Because of the abundance of studies, only a small fraction can be presented here. Other studies may have equal standards and useful information, but lack of space precludes their inclusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hunskaar, S., Arnold, E. P., Burgio, K., Diokno, A. C., Herzog, A. R., & Mallett, V. T. (2000). Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920070021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free