Structural insights into the substrate specificity of IMP-6 and IMP-1 metallo-β-lactamases

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases confer resistance to carbapenems and a broad spectrum of β-lactam antibiotics. IMP-6 and IMP-1 differ by only a point mutation: Ser262 in IMP-1 and Gly262 in IMP-6. The kcat/Km values of IMP-1 for imipenem and meropenem are nearly identical; however, for IMP-6, the kcat/Km for meropenem is 7-fold that for imipenem. In clinical practice, this may result in an ineffective therapeutic regimen and, consequently, in treatment failure. Here, we report the crystal structures of IMP-6 and IMP-1 with the same space group and similar cell constants at resolutions of 1.70 and 1.94 Å, respectively. The overall structures of IMP-6 and IMP-1 are similar. However, the loop region (residues 60-66), which participates in substrate binding, is more flexible in IMP-6 than in IMP-1. This difference in flexibility determines the substrate specificity of IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases for imipenem and meropenem. The amino acid at position 262 alters the mobility of His263; this affects the flexibility of the loop via a hydrogen bond with Pro68, which plays the role of a hinge in IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases. The substitution of Pro68 with a glycine elicited an increase in the Km of IMP-6 for imipenem, whereas the affinity for meropenem remained unchanged.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamamoto, K., Tanaka, H., Kurisu, G., Nakano, R., Yano, H., & Sakai, H. (2023). Structural insights into the substrate specificity of IMP-6 and IMP-1 metallo-β-lactamases. Journal of Biochemistry, 173(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvac080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free