It’s Complicated – Moral Nativism, Moral Input and Moral Development

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper provides a critical discussion of certain limitations of current nativist approaches to the question of moral development. The aim of the paper is to warn against a lingering reductive tendency found among certain contemporary moral nativists: a tendency to exaggerate the importance of innate mechanisms for moral development while simultaneously downplaying the importance of other factors in this process. The paper argues that the morally relevant input available in the social and cultural environment of human beings is much richer and more varied than typically acknowledged by moral nativists. By ignoring this richness the nativist runs the risk of distorting our understanding of the phenomenon we want to explain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nielsen, C. F. (2013). It’s Complicated – Moral Nativism, Moral Input and Moral Development. In Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy (Vol. 31, pp. 187–206). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6343-2_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free