Scalar-on-image regression via the soft-thresholded Gaussian process

51Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This work concerns spatial variable selection for scalar-on-image regression. We propose a new class of Bayesian nonparametric models and develop an efficient posterior computational algorithm. The proposed soft-thresholded Gaussian process provides large prior support over the class of piecewise-smooth, sparse, and continuous spatially varying regression coefficient functions. In addition, under some mild regularity conditions the soft-thresholded Gaussian process prior leads to the posterior consistency for parameter estimation and variable selection for scalar-on-image regression, even when the number of predictors is larger than the sample size. The proposed method is compared to alternatives via simulation and applied to an electroencephalography study of alcoholism.

References Powered by Scopus

Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso

36075Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso

1971Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature1

0
1082Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Probabilistic method for wind speed prediction and statistics distribution inference based on SHM data-driven

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian Scalar on Image Regression With Nonignorable Nonresponse

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian functional linear regression with sparse step functions

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kang, J., Reich, B. J., & Staicu, A. M. (2018). Scalar-on-image regression via the soft-thresholded Gaussian process. Biometrika, 105(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asx075

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

53%

Researcher 4

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 9

60%

Computer Science 4

27%

Neuroscience 1

7%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0