Assessment of polycarbonate material as a sustainable substitute for glazing in hot climates

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In modern buildings, it is evident that exterior glazing is highly desirable to enhance the visual environment and provide daylight. This study investigates the energy performance of polycarbonate glazing as a potential substitute for conventional glass. A detailed energy analysis is conducted using a design-builder simulation tool to simulate the performance of multiwall polycarbonate sheet and normal glass for a model residential building. The result shows that the polycarbonate sheet outperforms normal glass. The wall systems’ total annual cooling energy consumption for 16 mm triple 5-wall x-structure polycarbonate and the 3 mm regular single clear glass was 25,834 kWh and 39,565.18 kWh, respectively, resulting in 35% energy savings. Similarly, the skylights’ cooling energy consumption for the same polycarbonate types was 35,776.47 kWh and 63,340.74 kWh, respectively, resulting in 44% energy savings. The impact of aluminum and uPVC framings was insignificant. Therefore, polycarbonate sheets are an excellent alternative to glass.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohammed, M. A., Menkabo, M. M., & Budaiwi, I. M. (2023). Assessment of polycarbonate material as a sustainable substitute for glazing in hot climates. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2023.2246092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free