Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the collared flycatcher

141Citations
Citations of this article
226Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1. Public information, i.e. local reproductive performance of conspecifics, is expected to be a highly valuable cue for breeding habitat selection. However, the access to this cue may be spatially and temporally constrained. When public information is unavailable, individuals may use other integrative cues, such as the local density of breeders. 2. Departure decisions of collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis) were shown previously to be related to both public information and breeding density, in a long-term correlative study of a fragmented population. Here, we tested whether flycatchers also use public information (number and condition of fledglings produced locally) and breeding density to make individual settlement decisions in the following year. 3. Immigration rates were computed to measure the degree of attractiveness of patches to new breeders. We investigated the relative influence of public information and breeding density on immigration rates of yearlings and older adults separately. The access to public information for settlement decisions may indeed be more limited for yearlings. 4. Immigration rate in a patch increased with mean fledgling number in the previous year for older adults but not for yearlings. Yearling immigration rate was correlated positively to mean fledgling condition when patch breeding density in the previous year was low, but negatively when density was high. 5. Immigration rates of both yearlings and older adults increased with breeding density in the previous year. Breeding density explained a larger part of the variance in immig-ration rate than patch reproductive success. 6. The proportion of yearlings among breeders decreased with increasing patch reproductive success and breeding density in the previous year, suggesting that local competition was high in attractive patches. 7. Our results thus suggest that public information is also used for immigration decisions. However, decisions of yearlings are more complex than those of older adults, due to their more limited access to public information and the higher impact of intraspecific competition. Conversely, all individuals seemed to cue on breeding density in a similar way. Density is correlated to patch reproductive success, and may be a more easily accessible cue. We discuss the potential advantages of using conspecific density over conspecific reproductive performance for future immigration decisions.

References Powered by Scopus

The natal and breeding dispersal of birds.

1214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolution of dispersal: Theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals

710Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection

634Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Public information: From nosy neighbors to cultural evolution

1210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations

945Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: A review of public information use

267Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doligez, B., Pärt, T., Danchin, E., Clobert, J., & Gustafsson, L. (2004). Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the collared flycatcher. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00782.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 80

45%

Researcher 69

39%

Professor / Associate Prof. 23

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149

81%

Environmental Science 32

17%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

1%

Arts and Humanities 2

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free