This study provides a comparison of three methods, i.e., standard locally weighted averaging (LWA), least-norm solutions, and 1 -minimization, for model-free predictive control based on Just-In-Time modeling and database maintenance for an unstable system. In contrast to conventional model predictive control, the model-free predictive control method does not use any mathematical model; rather, it uses the past input/output data stored in a database. Although conventional stabilizing feedback is used to obtain the input/output data of an unstable system, model-free predictive control is assumed to be used without it. Three methods based on standard LWA, least-norm solutions, and 1 -minimization are statistically compared using a simple model. The results show that the methods of least-norm solutions and 1 -minimization are superior to that of LWA. The method by 1 -minimization yields tracking errors smaller than that by least-norm solutions; however, the method by 1 -minimization requires a long computational time. In addition, the effectiveness of a method of database maintenance is illustrated by numerical simulations.
CITATION STYLE
Saputra, H., & Yamamoto, S. (2015). Comparative Study of Model-Free Predictive Control and Its Database Maintenance for Unstable Systems. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration, 8(6), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.9746/jcmsi.8.390
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.