Comparative Study of Model-Free Predictive Control and Its Database Maintenance for Unstable Systems

  • Saputra H
  • Yamamoto S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study provides a comparison of three methods, i.e., standard locally weighted averaging (LWA), least-norm solutions, and 1 -minimization, for model-free predictive control based on Just-In-Time modeling and database maintenance for an unstable system. In contrast to conventional model predictive control, the model-free predictive control method does not use any mathematical model; rather, it uses the past input/output data stored in a database. Although conventional stabilizing feedback is used to obtain the input/output data of an unstable system, model-free predictive control is assumed to be used without it. Three methods based on standard LWA, least-norm solutions, and 1 -minimization are statistically compared using a simple model. The results show that the methods of least-norm solutions and 1 -minimization are superior to that of LWA. The method by 1 -minimization yields tracking errors smaller than that by least-norm solutions; however, the method by 1 -minimization requires a long computational time. In addition, the effectiveness of a method of database maintenance is illustrated by numerical simulations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saputra, H., & Yamamoto, S. (2015). Comparative Study of Model-Free Predictive Control and Its Database Maintenance for Unstable Systems. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration, 8(6), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.9746/jcmsi.8.390

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free