Environmental footprint of single-use surgical instruments in comparison with multi-use surgical instruments

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Manufacturers have been driven towards sustainable manufacturing due to various external and internal forces. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is widely used to assess a product's environmental performance in order to meet arising challenges. This research presents the environmental footprint assessment of single-use and multi-use surgical scissors which are manufactured by AESCULAP AG and a single-use surgical scissors produced by a comparable manufacturer. The cradle-to-gate and the cradle-to-grave assessments were conducted to compare the three surgical scissors using the IPCC GWP100 and Eco-indicator 99 methods. A break-even analysis estimates the preference between single-use and multi-use scissors depending on the use scenario.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schulz, J., Pschorn, J., Kara, S., Herrmann, C., Ibbotson, S., Dettmer, T., & Luger, T. (2011). Environmental footprint of single-use surgical instruments in comparison with multi-use surgical instruments. In Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing - Proceedings of the 18th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering (pp. 623–628). Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19692-8_108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free