Adjusting protein graphs based on graph entropy

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Measuring protein structural similarity attempts to establish a relationship of equivalence between polymer structures based on their conformations. In several recent studies, researchers have explored protein-graph remodeling, instead of looking a minimum superimposition for pairwise proteins. When graphs are used to represent structured objects, the problem of measuring object similarity become one of computing the similarity between graphs. Graph theory provides an alternative perspective as well as efficiency. Once a protein graph has been created, its structural stability must be verified. Therefore, a criterion is needed to determine if a protein graph can be used for structural comparison. In this paper, we propose a measurement for protein graph remodeling based on graph entropy. We extend the concept of graph entropy to determine whether a graph is suitable for representing a protein. The experimental results suggest that when applied, graph entropy helps a conformational on protein graph modeling. Furthermore, it indirectly contributes to protein structural comparison if a protein graph is solid.

References Powered by Scopus

The Protein Data Bank

32135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods

4920Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prediction and Entropy of Printed English

1739Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of Protein Quaternary Structures by Graph Approaches

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peng, S. L., & Tsay, Y. W. (2014). Adjusting protein graphs based on graph entropy. BMC Bioinformatics, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-s15-s6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Researcher 3

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

50%

Mathematics 2

25%

Chemistry 1

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free