A narrative review of the impact of the transition to ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM/PCS

18Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The United States transitioned to the tenth version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system (ICD-10) for mortality coding in 1999 and to the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification and Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-CM/PCS) on October 1, 2015. The purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative literature review to better understand the impact of the implementation of ICD-10/ICD-10-CM/PCS. Materials and Methods: We searched English-language articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Business Source Complete and reviewed websites of relevant professional associations, government agencies, research groups, and ICD-10 news aggregators to identify literature on the impact of the ICD-10/ICD-10-CM/PCS transition. We used Google to search for additional gray literature and used handsearching of the references of the most on-target articles to help ensure comprehensiveness. Results: Impact areas reported in the literature include: productivity and staffing, costs, reimbursement, coding accuracy, mapping between ICD versions, morbidity and mortality surveillance, and patient care. With the exception of morbidity and mortality surveillance, quantitative studies describing the actual impact of the ICD-10/ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation were limited and much of the literature was based on the ICD-10-CM/PCS transition rather than the earlier conversion to ICD-10 for mortality coding. Discussion: This study revealed several gaps in the literature that limit the ability to draw reliable conclusions about the overall impact, positive or negative, of moving to ICD-10/ICD-10-CM/PCS in the United States. Conclusion: These knowledge gaps present an opportunity for future research and knowledge sharing and will be important to consider when planning for ICD-11.

References Powered by Scopus

ICD-10: History and context

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparing chronic condition rates using ICD-9 and ICD-10 in VA patients FY2014-2016

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The discriminatory cost of ICD-10-CM transition between clinical specialties: Metrics, case study, and mitigating tools

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Age-sex specific pulmonary embolism-related mortality in the USA and Canada, 2000–18: an analysis of the WHO Mortality Database and of the CDC Multiple Cause of Death database

150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of ICD-9 to ICD-10 Coding Transition on Prevalence Trends in Neurology

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Limited Access to Facial Feminization Geographically Despite Nationwide Expansion of Other Gender-Affirming Surgeries

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kusnoor, S. V., Blasingame, M. N., Williams, A. M., DesAutels, S. J., Su, J., & Giuse, N. B. (2020). A narrative review of the impact of the transition to ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM/PCS. JAMIA Open. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAMIAOPEN/OOZ066

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

29%

Computer Science 3

21%

Decision Sciences 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free