Insights into teachers’ perceptions of parental involvement as a predictor of educational inequity

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For many decades, parental involvement (PI) has been discussed as an important variable in students’ development. However, those concerned with educational policy, practice, and research have traditionally helped perpetuate the well-known and undisputed narrative of the ‘parents who care’ who are actively involved in all aspects of student learning. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative data from a total of 485 teachers working at Austrian schools, the current study aims to contribute to a recently growing research paradigm that challenges traditional understandings of PI that are biased toward families who adhere to expected behaviours of home and school involvement and academic socialisation. The results suggest that primary and secondary teachers’ ratings of PI differ between diverse students and at different school levels. Moreover, participants’ explanations for disparities in PI between students align with a deficit-oriented, narrow understanding of PI, aimed at middle-class families that cling to traditional activities of PI.

References Powered by Scopus

Parental Involvement in Middle School: A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Strategies That Promote Achievement

1157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis

881Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis

573Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woltran, F. (2023). Insights into teachers’ perceptions of parental involvement as a predictor of educational inequity. Education 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2265392

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 4

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 3

43%

Social Sciences 2

29%

Psychology 1

14%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0