Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the short-form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-11) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We extracted data from 670 people with physical disabilities (PWPD) from the Korea Welfare Panel. To investigate the model fit regarding factor structure, a one-factor model, four-factor model, and four-factor within bifactor model, as reported in previous studies, were examined using CFA, and goodness-of-fit indices were compared. As a result of the analysis, the four-factor model and the four-factor within bifactor model satisfied the criteria of correspondence with goodness-of-fit indices. Reliability of the four individual factors ranged from 0.722 to 0.834, indicating acceptable reliability. Validity and reliability of the four-factor within bifactor structure was confirmed through CFA and reliability analysis. In future studies using the CES-D-11 to measure depression in PWPD, comparison between four sub-factors and total scores might be possible.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, E. Y. (2021). Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free