OP0231 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF JAK-INHIBITORS, TNF-INHIBITORS, ABATACEPT AND IL-6 INHIBITORS IN AN INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION OF REGISTERS OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS (THE “JAK-POT” STUDY)

  • Lauper K
  • Mongin D
  • Bergstra S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In many countries, JAK-inhibitors (JAKi) have only recently been approved as treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of JAKi compared to bDMARDs in RA patients in the real-world population in an international collaboration of registers (the “JAK-pot” collaboration). Methods: Patients initiating either JAKi, TNFi, IL-6i or abatacept (ABA) during a time period when JAKi were available in each country (19 registers, Table) were included. We compared the effectiveness of JAKi and bDMARDs in terms of retention using crude and adjusted survival analysis. Missing covariates were imputed using multiple imputation. Results: Among 25521 included patients, 6063 initiated a JAKi, 13879 a TNFi, 2348 ABA, and 3231 an IL-6i. Patients were on average 55 years old, with a mean disease duration 10 years, mostly seropositive (67%), female (77%) and with moderate disease activity at treatment initiation. The main reason of stopping treatment was ineffectiveness (49%), followed by adverse events (21%). Patients on JAKi were treated more often as monotherapy, had higher CRP and disease activity at baseline and had experienced more previous ts/ bDMARDs. Crude median retention was 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-1.5) years for JAKi, 1.6 (1.6-1.7) for TNFi, 1.5 (1.3-1.7) for IL6i and 1.1 (1.0-1.3) for ABA. After adjustment, the hazard ratio (HR) for discontinuation tended to be lower for JAKi (HR 0.86 (0.65-1.13)) compared to TNFi, but comparable for ABA (1.02 (0.94-1.10)) and IL6i (0.99 (0.88-1.10)) (Figure 1). HRs differed notably between countries (Figure 2). Conclusion: The adjusted overall drug retention of JAKi tended to be higher than for TNFi, with large variation between countries. Other measures of effectiveness, such as the evaluation of CDAI remission and low disease activity are planned to shape a more comprehensive picture of JAKi effectiveness in the real world.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lauper, K., Mongin, D., Bergstra, S. A., Choquette, D., Codreanu, C., De Cock, D., … Finckh, A. (2020). OP0231 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF JAK-INHIBITORS, TNF-INHIBITORS, ABATACEPT AND IL-6 INHIBITORS IN AN INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION OF REGISTERS OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS (THE “JAK-POT” STUDY). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 79(Suppl 1), 146–147. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free