Assessing individual bioequivalence using the structural equation model

18Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The structural equation model (SEM) is introduced as a useful approach for assessing individual bioequivalence. SEM parameters are estimated using a partial likelihood analysis and the hypotheses of individual bioequivalence is evaluated in a disaggregate way, testing separately the hypothesis concerning SEM parameters, and assessing the overall hypothesis of individual bioequivalence using the intersection-union principle. Limits of bioequivalence for SEM parameters are proposed and a power analysis is carried out. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability

2296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Partial likelihood

2141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bioequivalence trials, intersectio–union tests and equivalence confidence sets

502Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements

258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bioequivalence Studies in Drug Development: Methods and Applications

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Students academic and social concerns during COVID-19 pandemic

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carrasco, J. L., & Jover, L. (2003, March 30). Assessing individual bioequivalence using the structural equation model. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1452

Readers over time

‘12‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘2101234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 5

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 5

45%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

9%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0