The (Un)Intended Consequences of Emphasizing the Threats of Mis-and Disinformation

23Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The mis‐ and disinformation order does not only consist of the dissemination of deceptive content but also involves using fake news as a blame‐shifting label in politics and society. The salience of this label on social media and in political dis-course, and the frequent discussions held about the threats of fake news in public opinion, may result in a systematic overestimation of mis‐ and disinformation’s presence. Even more so, these primed perceptions about false information may affect people’s evaluations of factually accurate information. In this article, we offer a theoretical account of how the public’s and media’s attention to mis‐ and disinformation, fake news labels, and the threats of mis‐ and disinformation may have a negative impact on people’s trust in factually accurate information and authentic news. In addition, relying on an experimental case study of pre‐bunking interventions, we illustrate the extent to which tools intended to increase media literacy in the face of mis‐ and disinformation may also have ramifications for trust in reliable information. Based on this, we propose a forward‐looking perspective and recommendations on how interventions can circumvent unintended consequences of flagging false information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hameleers, M. (2023). The (Un)Intended Consequences of Emphasizing the Threats of Mis-and Disinformation. Media and Communication, 11(2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6301

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free