Effect of plastic deformation on the proof strength and electrical conductivity of copper-magnesium supersaturated solid-solution alloys

15Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The influences of plastic deformation on the proof strength and electrical conductivity of Copper-Magnesium (Cu-Mg) supersaturated solid-solution alloys are investigated and compared to results obtained for pure copper and conventional binary solid-solution copper alloys. Supersaturated Cu-Mg required cold rolling to only a quarter of the equivalent strain (ε = 0.65) of conventional alloys (ε = 2.66) to obtain the same proof strength and electrical conductivity. Furthermore, when cold-rolled to ε = 2.66, Cu-Mg exhibited an electrical conductivity 2.5 times higher than that of conventional alloys, while retaining comparable proof strength.

References Powered by Scopus

The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III Discussion of results

7056Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials

4262Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strengthening materials by engineering coherent internal boundaries at the nanoscale

2245Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Phase transformation behaviors and properties of a high strength Cu-Ni-Si alloy

182Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Microstructural evolution, phase transition, and physics properties of a high strength Cu–Ni–Si–Al alloy

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of deformation methods on microstructure, texture, and properties of a Cu–Mg alloy

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ito, Y., Matsunaga, H., Mori, H., & Maki, K. (2014). Effect of plastic deformation on the proof strength and electrical conductivity of copper-magnesium supersaturated solid-solution alloys. Materials Transactions, 55(11), 1738–1741. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M2014220

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘20‘21‘22‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 6

75%

Engineering 2

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0