Prospect theory, indifference curves, and hedging risks

35Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The prospect theory is one of the most popular decision-making theories. It is based on S-shaped utility functions, unlike the von Neumann and Morgenstern (NM) theory, which is based on concave utility functions. The S-shaped functions bring challenges, and extensions and generalizations of the NM theory into the prospect theory are not always possible. For example, in the prospect theory, the monotonicity of indifference curves depends on the underlying mean, unlike in the NM theory. Risk-hedging decisions also become more complex within the prospect theory. In this paper, we discuss these topics and establish general results concerning certain covariances from which we can in turn infer properties of indifference curves and hedging decisions within the prospect theory. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

PORTFOLIO SELECTION

16833Citations
5361Readers
Get full text
Get full text
2072Citations
1241Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Broll, U., Egozcue, M., Wong, W. K., & Zitikis, R. (2010). Prospect theory, indifference curves, and hedging risks. Applied Mathematics Research EXpress, 2010(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/amrx/abq013

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘16‘17‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

36%

Researcher 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

38%

Social Sciences 2

15%

Psychology 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0