Communicability and empathy: The problem of Sensus Communis in Kester's dialogical aesthetics

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, I sketch out and examine the aesthetic basis of an implicit ontological model of community, grounded on dialogical practice, which appears in Grant Kester's proposal for a dialogical theory of socially engaged contemporary art. I address two distinct but related aspects of Kester's view on understanding as a constitutive part of dialogical aesthetic experience. First, I endeavour to show that the post-foundational framework of a 'procedural knowledge' which he uses to support his theory of aesthetic communication requires a stronger intersubjective ground to ensure the actual empathic understanding of the other dialogical partner. In this respect, I claim that he could be using the Kantian notion of sensus communis in a constitutive rather than in a regulative manner, thus grounding empathy on an ante-predicative level of experiencing alterity. This unorthodox usage of the Kantian aesthetic postulate points towards a particular understanding of sensus communis as the universal communicability of human finitude, which I eventually argue for on the lines of Jean-Luc Nancy's thinking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nae, C. (2011). Communicability and empathy: The problem of Sensus Communis in Kester’s dialogical aesthetics. Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics. Akademie Ved Ceske Republiky. https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.74

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free