Heritabilities, Intertrait Genetic Correlations, GxE Interaction and Predicted Genetic Gains for Acoustic Velocity in Mid-rotation Coastal Douglas fir

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Acoustic velocity (AV) data from 7, 423 coastal Douglas-fir trees drawn from 347 wind-pollinated families on 14 sites, from four first-generation testing programs in the north Oregon Cascades, were analyzed. Families were measured on two or four sites at ages 23 to 41 years from seed using the Fakopp TreeSonic standingtree tool. Height (HT) and DBH data collected at ages 15 and 16 from seed, from all trees in the four programs (95,795 trees, 955 families), were used to calculate volume index (VOL = HT*DBH2) and stem taper (TAP = DBH/HT). All traits were analyzed using multivariate mixed model analyses. Across-site individual narrow-sense heritabilities for AV2 ranged from 0.24 to 0.40 among first-generation programs, compared to 0.12 to 0.23 for HT, 0.10 to 0.16 for DBH, 0.11 to 0.20 for VOL and 0.14 to 0.17 for TAP. Across-site type B correlations for AV2 ranged from 0.85 to 0.95, compared to 0.62 to 0.83 for HT, 0.60 to 0.74 for DBH, 0.67 to 0.78 for VOL and 0.66 to 0.79 for TAP. AV2 was negatively correlated with HT in three programs (rA=0.17 to -0.28), and negatively correlated with DBH (-0.12 to -0.46), VOL (-0.05 to -0.44) and TAP (-0.09 to -0.40) in all four programs. Selecting the top 10% of the families sampled based on AV2 gave predicted gains of 4.4% to 9.6% for AV2 and -9.3% to 10.6% for VOL. The adverse genetic correlations between AV2 and growth, and the losses in gain in AV2 from selection based on growth, may be oversestimated by suppression of slower-growing families in these older tests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jayawickrama, K. J. S., Ye, T. Z., & Howe, G. T. (2011). Heritabilities, Intertrait Genetic Correlations, GxE Interaction and Predicted Genetic Gains for Acoustic Velocity in Mid-rotation Coastal Douglas fir. Silvae Genetica, 60(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2011-0002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free