A simple, practical framework for organizing relationship-based reciprocity in service-learning experiences: Insights from anthropology

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Among service-learning and community engagement scholars, there exist diverse positions on what qualifies as valid, appropriate, and desirable in the structure and outcomes of service-learning experiences. While most agree that reciprocity is a key principle of the pedagogy, “reciprocity” is often descriptive rather than operationalized for practical application. This article applies the anthropological conceptualization of reciprocity as a social process of relationship building through exchange in order to analyze the nature of engagement among the various parties in two different models of course-based service-learning. From this analysis emerges a practical, relationship-based, planning framework for establishing norms, moderating expectations, and evaluating outcomes. Focusing on a set of simple questions about service-learning relationships, objectives, structure, outcomes, and resulting relationships (ROSOR), the framework offers a simple way for instructors and their community partners to navigate the discourse on service-learning and develop impactful relationships.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bennett, E. (2018). A simple, practical framework for organizing relationship-based reciprocity in service-learning experiences: Insights from anthropology. International Journal for Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.6999

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free