The marginality principle revisited: Should “higher-order” terms always be accompanied by “lower-order” terms in regression analyses?

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The marginality principle guides analysts to avoid omitting lower-order terms from models in which higher-order terms are included as covariates. Lower-order terms are viewed as “marginal” to higher-order terms. We consider how this principle applies to three cases: regression models that may include the ratio of two measured variables; polynomial transformations of a measured variable; and factorial arrangements of defined interventions. For each case, we show that which terms or transformations are considered to be lower-order, and therefore marginal, depends on the scale of measurement, which is frequently arbitrary. Understanding the implications of this point leads to an intuitive understanding of the curse of dimensionality. We conclude that the marginality principle may be useful to analysts in some specific cases but caution against invoking it as a context-free recipe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morris, T. P., van Smeden, M., & Pham, T. M. (2023). The marginality principle revisited: Should “higher-order” terms always be accompanied by “lower-order” terms in regression analyses? Biometrical Journal, 65(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.202300069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free