Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks

545Citations
Citations of this article
322Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most proteins do not evolve in isolation, but as components of complex genetic networks. Therefore, a protein's position in a network may indicate how central it is to cellular function and, hence, how constrained it is evolutionarily. To look for an effect of position on evolutionary rate, we examined the protein-protein interaction networks in three eukaryotes: yeast, worm, and fly. We find that the three networks have remarkably similar structure, such that the number of interactors per protein and the centrality of proteins in the networks have similar distributions. Proteins that have a more central position in all three networks, regardless of the number of direct interactors, evolve more slowly and are more likely to be essential for survival. Our results are thus consistent with a classic proposal of Fisher's that pleiotropy constrains evolution. © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hahn, M. W., & Kern, A. D. (2005). Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 22(4), 803–806. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free