Effect of initiating enteral protein feeding on whole-body protein turnover in critically ill patients

47Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients are susceptible to protein catabolism. Enteral feeding may ameliorate protein loss, but its effect is not well characterized in terms of protein kinetics. Objective: We established a method of quantifying the effect of enteral protein feeding on whole-body protein turnover and studied critically ill patients receiving early enteral nutrition. Design: In a proof-of-concept study, we established, in healthy subjects (n = 6), a method of measuring the effect of continuous enteral protein feeding on whole-body protein turnover by using 13C-phenylalanine (13C-Phe) intrinsically labeled casein by a nasogastric feeding tube and an intravenous 2H5-Phe tracer. The protocol was applied to study critically ill patients (n = 10) during the initial hypocalorichyponitrogenous dose of enteral nutrition. Results: Patients were catabolic with a negative protein balance. The median splanchnic extraction fraction of hourly dietary Phe intake was 92% (range: 86-99%); that is, the availability of dietary Phe in arterial plasma was low. In patients with a stable parenteral amino acid supply (n = 7), the median net protein balance improved during enteral feeding from -8.6 to -5.8 μmol · kg body weight-1 · h-1 (P = 0.018). Conclusions: Whole-body protein turnover and the contribution of dietary protein can be quantified in critically ill patients by using intravenous and enteral stable-isotope Phe tracers. The whole-body protein balance improved during early hypocaloric-hyponitrogenous enteral protein feeding in these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liebau, F., Wernerman, J., Van Loon, L. J. C., & Rooyackers, O. (2015). Effect of initiating enteral protein feeding on whole-body protein turnover in critically ill patients. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 101(3), 549–557. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.114.091934

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free