Interpreting the results of the COURAGE trial: A non-interventionalist perspective

1Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial was designed to determine whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) coupled with optimal medical therapy (OMT) reduced the risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with stable coronary artery disease as compared with OMT alone. COURAGE demonstrated that an initial strategy of PCI added to OMT in these patients relieved angina to a greater extent than an initial strategy of OMT alone for a period of approximately 24 months. The initial strategy of PCI (plus OMT) did not reduce death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events compared with OMT alone. The important quality-of-life findings permit physicians to engage in an evidence-based discussion with patients about the expected clinical and health status benefits of initial versus deferred PCI when added to OMT. © 2009 MedReviews® , LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boden, W. E. (2009). Interpreting the results of the COURAGE trial: A non-interventionalist perspective. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3909/ricm10S20005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free