Youth centers, structured leisure activities, and friends of native and foreign origin: A two-wave longitudinal study

3Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The social integration of adolescents of foreign origin is of much importance to contemporary Swedish politics, and knowledge is needed about the associations between different forms of leisure and social integration. The present study tests the associations between visits to youth centers and participation in structured leisure activities, on the one hand, and having friends regardless of origin, of native origin, and of foreign origin, on the other. Two-wave longitudinal data from 203 adolescents of foreign origin were collected, including friendship nominations from 1,185 peers. Cross-lagged panel models were constructed, controlling for relevant confounders. Visits to youth centers positively predicted the number of friends of foreign origin, while participation in structured leisure activities positively predicted the number of friends regardless of origin. In conclusion, structured leisure activities appear better than youth centers for promoting the social integration of adolescents of foreign origin into networks of friends of different origins.

References Powered by Scopus

18594Citations
6736Readers
Get full text
7856Citations
14961Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

I Have to do it, but I like it: The Sense of Enjoyment and Obligation in Adolescents’ Organized Leisure-Time Activities

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aronson, O., & Gerdner, A. (2021). Youth centers, structured leisure activities, and friends of native and foreign origin: A two-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Leisure Research, 52(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1780521

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Design 3

33%

Social Sciences 3

33%

Psychology 2

22%

Environmental Science 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 153

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free