Adaptation and validation of the Evidence-based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP2Q) for clinical postgraduates in a Chinese context

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an essential approach of optimizing patient outcomes and driving progress in clinical practice. As an important reserve talent of medical staff and researchers, the clinical postgraduates are expected to become the backbones of supporting the implementation of EBP in clinical units after graduation. The assessment of their EBP learning outcomes is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study is to adapt the Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP2Q) to Mainland China’s cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese EBP2Q in clinical postgraduates. Methods: Cross-cultural modification, including translating the original EBP2Q into Chinese was implemented according to established guidelines. A pilot study was carried out in Mainland China among 30 clinical postgraduates. A subsequent validation study was conducted among 633 clinical postgraduates majoring in clinical medicine, stomatology and nursing from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 313), together with confirmatory factor analysis (n = 320). Reliability was determined by internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: The Chinese EBP2Q consisted of 40 items. The content validity index of the Chinese EBP2Q achieved 0.938 at an acceptable level. Principal component analysis resulted in a four-factor structure explaining 61.586% of the total variance. All fitting indices satisfied the standard based upon confirmatory factor analyses, indicating that the four-factor structure contributed to an ideal model fit. The internal consistency appeared high for the Chinese EBP2Q, reaching a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.926. Test–retest reliability was 0.868 and the split-half coefficient was 0.925. Conclusion: Chinese version of EBP2Q possesses adequate validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. It is a promising questionnaire to be adopted by Chinese medical educators in designing their course and curriculum, or by clinical postgraduates for self-assessment of EBP learning.

References Powered by Scopus

Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures

9172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Focus on research methods: Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations

3106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding Bland Altman analysis

2859Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Adaptation and validation of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP<sup>2</sup>) questionnaire in a Norwegian primary healthcare setting

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The validity and reliability properties of a Persian version of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP<sup>2</sup>) questionnaire among Iranian students of health-related fields

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jia, Y., Zhuang, X., Zhang, Y., Meng, G., Qin, S., Shi, W. X., … Zhang, Y. P. (2023). Adaptation and validation of the Evidence-based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP2Q) for clinical postgraduates in a Chinese context. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04594-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 5

63%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

25%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free