Culture as Contested Field

  • Hasse C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With the introduction of the distinction between the analytical and empirical field, this chapter initiates a new vocabulary tied to an anthropology of learning. I argue that researchers engage differently with the two fields. That distinction is particularly recognisable within the analytical field of organisational culture, where participants engage in ongoing fights over culture concepts. The different conceptualisations of culture create, in part, what is perceived as meaningful materials in the empirical field. I exemplify with three different perspectives on a small Italian tourist organisation in Sardinia. In order for the analytical field to move beyond deconstructions and denouncements of the culture concept, I argue a new focus on learning in relation to space-time-mattering with ethnographic subjects is needed. This entails an emphasis on the researcher's learning processes in the empirical field, rather than forceful discussions in the analytical field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasse, C. (2015). Culture as Contested Field. In An Anthropology of Learning (pp. 29–62). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9606-4_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free